Skip to content
NOWCAST KCCI News at 5am Weekday Morning
Live Now
Advertisement

Starting next year, child influencers can sue if earnings aren't set aside, says new Illinois law

So far, there are minimal regulations for the "sharenthood" industry, which experts say can cause serious harm to children

Starting next year, child influencers can sue if earnings aren't set aside, says new Illinois law

So far, there are minimal regulations for the "sharenthood" industry, which experts say can cause serious harm to children

Wait is that him on top of the car or these are just people on top of the car. Yeah, that's him today. At about 1:30 p.m. The NYPD became aware of *** proud forming in Union Square. It was quickly determined that an influencer was posted on social media about showing up the Union Square and was encouraging all of his followers to come to the park. There were some posts also about giving away some gaming systems. At approximately 3 p.m. the post went viral and thousands of people began to arrive at Union Square, the park and the surrounding streets were overrun with people. They were obstructing both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. In terms of people, there were thousands of people out here. It wasn't the hundreds of people. There was thousands of mostly young people out here. I personally observed young people walking out with their heads, bleeding from their heads, bleeding from on their faces. I've seen, I personally observed young people having panic attacks, anxiety attacks, asthma attacks. There was multiple people were suffering out here. There was *** lot of people, it was uncontrolled. It took us *** while to get it under control and *** lot of young people got hurt vigils in the park began to commit acts of violence towards the police and the public. After numerous warnings and after being assailed, hit with rocks and bottles and other debris, we started to make arrests to clear out the park. Our officers were attacked. We were in there, we were crushed. We were pushed. I had officers on the floor. I was in the middle of the crowd. I was hit with multiple objects as well. The influencer we were able to eventually get him out of the park and remove him for safety reasons. Speaks to the power of social media and the danger of social media. We do monitor social media. When I go back later on this evening, I will have an after action to determine exactly what our steps were. We can't allow this to happen again in the future.
Advertisement
Starting next year, child influencers can sue if earnings aren't set aside, says new Illinois law

So far, there are minimal regulations for the "sharenthood" industry, which experts say can cause serious harm to children

Illinois is the first state in the U.S. to ensure child social media influencers are compensated for their work, according to Sen. David Koehler, of Peoria, who sponsored a bill that was signed into law and will go into effect on July 1, 2024."The rise of social media has given children new opportunities to earn a profit," Koehler said in an emailed press release after the bill was signed Friday afternoon. "Many parents have taken this opportunity to pocket the money, while making their children continue to work in these digital environments."The idea for the law, which covers children under the age of 16 featured in monetized online platforms, including video blogs (also known as vlogs), was brought to Koehler by a 15-year-old in his district, the Democratic senator said.Besides coordinated dances and funny toddler comments, family vlogs nowadays may share intimate details of their children's lives — grades, potty training, illnesses, misbehaviors, first periods — for countless strangers to view. Brand deals featuring the internet's darlings can reap tens of thousands of dollars per video, but so far, there are minimal regulations for the "sharenthood" industry, which experts say can cause serious harm to children."Videos with kids do really well," said Bobbi Althoff, a TikTok user with more than 5 million followers who once featured her young daughter in paid advertising, but has since decided not to for privacy reasons.Many states already require parents to set aside earnings for child entertainers who perform in more traditional settings such as movies and television, but Illinois' law will be the first to specifically target social media starlets, according to Landon Jacquinot, who is tracking child labor legislation for the National Conference of State Legislatures."We could see other states looking into doing something similar, especially in states that have a high volume of family vloggers and social media influencers," such as California and New York, Jacquinot said. "It's kind of a new world."The Illinois law will entitle child influencers to a percentage of earnings based on how often they appear on video blogs or online content that generates at least 10 cents per view. To qualify, the content must be created in Illinois, and kids would have to be featured in at least 30% of the content in a 30-day period.Video bloggers — or vloggers — would be responsible for maintaining records of kids' appearances and must set aside gross earnings for the child in a trust account for when they turn 18; otherwise, the child can sue.Children "deserve to be shielded from parents who would attempt to take advantage of their child's talents and use them for their own financial gain," said Alex Gough, a spokesperson for Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, after the governor signed the legislation.Shreya Nallamothu, the teen who brought her concerns to Koehler and set the legislation in motion, first zeroed in on the issue while scrolling through social media during quarantine three years ago."I realized that there's a lot of exploitation that can happen within the world of 'kidfluencing,'" said Nallamothu, now 16. "And I realized that there was absolutely zero legislation in place to protect them."She clarified that the law is not meant for parents who share photos of their kids on social media for family and friends or even those who post a viral video. "This is for families who make their income off of child vlogging and family vlogging," she said.Lawmakers in Illinois, where Democrats hold a supermajority, passed the bill in May with bipartisan support.Other Democratic-led states have made efforts to regulate the child influencer industry with less success. A 2018 California child labor bill included a social media provision that was removed by the time it was passed. Washington state's 2023 bill — spearheaded by Chris McCarty, another teen and the founder of Quit Clicking Kids, an advocacy organization focused on protecting minors being monetized online — stalled out in committee."I sincerely hope that this momentum continues in other states and eventually nationwide," McCarty said Friday about the Illinois law.But several Republican-led states this year have instead loosened child labor laws to help alleviate workforce shortages. An Iowa law signed at the end of May allows teenagers to work more jobs and for longer hours, and Arkansas in March eliminated permits that required employers to verify a child's age and a parent's consent.___Savage is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Illinois is the first state in the U.S. to ensure child social media influencers are compensated for their work, according to Sen. David Koehler, of Peoria, who sponsored a bill that was signed into law and will go into effect on July 1, 2024.

"The rise of social media has given children new opportunities to earn a profit," Koehler said in an emailed press release after the bill was signed Friday afternoon. "Many parents have taken this opportunity to pocket the money, while making their children continue to work in these digital environments."

Advertisement

The idea for the law, which covers children under the age of 16 featured in monetized online platforms, including video blogs (also known as vlogs), was brought to Koehler by a 15-year-old in his district, the Democratic senator said.

Besides coordinated dances and funny toddler comments, family vlogs nowadays may share intimate details of their children's lives — grades, potty training, illnesses, misbehaviors, first periods — for countless strangers to view. Brand deals featuring the internet's darlings can reap tens of thousands of dollars per video, but so far, there are minimal regulations for the "sharenthood" industry, which experts say can cause serious harm to children.

"Videos with kids do really well," said Bobbi Althoff, a TikTok user with more than 5 million followers who once featured her young daughter in paid advertising, but has since decided not to for privacy reasons.

Many states already require parents to set aside earnings for child entertainers who perform in more traditional settings such as movies and television, but Illinois' law will be the first to specifically target social media starlets, according to Landon Jacquinot, who is tracking child labor legislation for the National Conference of State Legislatures.

"We could see other states looking into doing something similar, especially in states that have a high volume of family vloggers and social media influencers," such as California and New York, Jacquinot said. "It's kind of a new world."

The Illinois law will entitle child influencers to a percentage of earnings based on how often they appear on video blogs or online content that generates at least 10 cents per view. To qualify, the content must be created in Illinois, and kids would have to be featured in at least 30% of the content in a 30-day period.

Video bloggers — or vloggers — would be responsible for maintaining records of kids' appearances and must set aside gross earnings for the child in a trust account for when they turn 18; otherwise, the child can sue.

Children "deserve to be shielded from parents who would attempt to take advantage of their child's talents and use them for their own financial gain," said Alex Gough, a spokesperson for Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, after the governor signed the legislation.

Shreya Nallamothu, the teen who brought her concerns to Koehler and set the legislation in motion, first zeroed in on the issue while scrolling through social media during quarantine three years ago.

"I realized that there's a lot of exploitation that can happen within the world of 'kidfluencing,'" said Nallamothu, now 16. "And I realized that there was absolutely zero legislation in place to protect them."

She clarified that the law is not meant for parents who share photos of their kids on social media for family and friends or even those who post a viral video. "This is for families who make their income off of child vlogging and family vlogging," she said.

Lawmakers in Illinois, where Democrats hold a supermajority, passed the bill in May with bipartisan support.

Other Democratic-led states have made efforts to regulate the child influencer industry with less success. A 2018 California child labor bill included a social media provision that was removed by the time it was passed. Washington state's 2023 bill — spearheaded by Chris McCarty, another teen and the founder of Quit Clicking Kids, an advocacy organization focused on protecting minors being monetized online — stalled out in committee.

"I sincerely hope that this momentum continues in other states and eventually nationwide," McCarty said Friday about the Illinois law.

But several Republican-led states this year have instead loosened child labor laws to help alleviate workforce shortages. An Iowa law signed at the end of May allows teenagers to work more jobs and for longer hours, and Arkansas in March eliminated permits that required employers to verify a child's age and a parent's consent.

___

Savage is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.